Jenkins vs GitLab : Core Differences

August 2024 · 7 minute read

With the growing use of online platforms and the rise in the number of online products/service providers, user expectations are, to put it lightly, high. Releasing advanced features regularly is essential to keep up with tough online competition and retain customers.

This is where the concepts of Continuous Integration (CI) and Continuous Development (CD) come into the software development process. Through CI/CD, businesses can put up their software applications for their audiences’ use and add advanced features from time to time via release cycles.

Jenkins and GitLab are open-source CI/CD servers that enable automation for various software development, testing, and deployment stages. This article compares these two widely used CI/CD servers. But before they are compared, let’s discuss these servers and how they function individually.

Table of Contents

What is Jenkins?

Jenkins is an automation server that is self-contained and open source. It allows the building, testing, and deployment of every software release cycle. Through its fleet of plugins (over 1700) that seamlessly integrate with most CI/CD tools, Jenkins offers flexibility and covers almost all functional requirements.

Moreover, since Jenkins is written in Java, it is compatible with any system with Java Runtime Environment (JRE) installed. This makes Jenkins widely usable due to its easy availability.

Jenkins is one of the most popular CI/CD automation servers in existence due to the following features:

Test your builds on BrowserStack

Automate Continous Testing with Jenkins-BrowserStack

Advantages of Jenkins

Disadvantages of Jenkins

What is GitLab?

GitLab CI is a self-contained platform supporting the DevOps lifecycle through web-based services. It manages the Git repository through its Continuous Integration and Deployment pipelines, issue-tracking features, and wiki to store relevant files.

GitLab works on a freemium basis, i.e., it offers both free and paid services. It enables automating the entire DevOps lifecycle, which involves planning, building, testing, deployment, and monitoring through release cycles.

Stages of DevOps Lifecycle

GitLab enables Concurrent DevOps, which speeds up the development lifecycle. GitLab combines Development, Security, and Ops through its services to deliver faster with utmost security. It is written in Ruby, but the tech stack includes Go, Ruby on Rails, and Vue.js.

GitLab has gained a lot of traction in the CI/CD landscape due to the following features:

Advantages of GitLab

Disadvantages of GitLab

GitLab CI vs Jenkins

Tabulated below is the detailed difference between Jenkins vs Gitlab CI.

CriteriaJenkinsGitLab
LanguageJavaRuby
Ease of InstallationEasy to InstallEasy to Install
Plugins1700+ plugins availableLimited Plugins
PrerequisitesJRE should be installedRuby, Go, Git, Node.js, and Redis should be installed
Operating Systems SupportedWindows, Mac OS X, and Unix-like OSSupports only particular Unix-like OS such as Ubuntu, Debian, Red Hat Linux, Scientific Linux, Oracle Linux, CentOS, and OpenSUSE. It does not support Windows and macOS.
Open SourceOpen Source and FreeOpen Source and Freemium
Issue TrackingDon’t have such functionalityOffers various features for issue tracking and management
ExtensivenessHighly extensive as it can be used as a simple CI server or can be transformed into a complex CD system with the help of pluginsOffers scalability to enhance the DevOps lifecycle for a project
SupportOffers documentation and open source community support, but no technical support is provided as part of the SLAProvides 24×5 support for paid users and only self-support documents to free users as part of the SLA 

Which one is better: Jenkins vs GitLab CI?

One of the most asked questions among those evaluating Jenkins vs Gitlab CI is “Can GitLab replace Jenkins?.”

So to answer the question, “Can GitLab replace Jenkins?”

No, GitLab and Jenkins have their features, and deciding which one to pick depends on the project requirements and the priorities.

No matter which CI/CD server is chosen, testing the application’s cross-platform compatibility on real browsers and devices is mandatory. It is the only way to guarantee that the software delivers seamless and consistent UX irrespective of the device and browser used to access them.

Emulators and simulators do not offer the real user conditions that software must run within, making the results of any tests run on them inaccurate. Consider testing websites and apps on a real device cloud, preferably one that offers the latest devices, browsers, and OS versions. This applies to both manual and automated testing.

BrowserStack’s real device cloud provides 3000+ real browsers and devices for instant, on-demand testing. It also provides a cloud Selenium grid for selenium automated testing, which can be accelerated by 10X with parallel testing. The cloud also provides integrations with popular CI/CD tools such as Jira, Jenkins, TeamCity, Travis CI, and more.

integrationsAdditionally, in-built debugging tools let testers identify and resolve bugs immediately. BrowserStack also facilitates Cypress testing on 30+ browser versions with instant, hassle-free parallelization.

Try BrowserStack for Free

ncG1vNJzZmivp6x7o77OsKqeqqOprqS3jZympmeXqralsY6jnKejmaPAbsLSZp6irJyWrw%3D%3D